Have you ever had your day in court ?

This webpage was created to counter a court system that is destroying this country and our very lives. Here is a free flow of information to those who need it most, those who are battling the system now and also for those who are trying to remain free of its grasp. The best way to stop this “judicial creature” is through knowledge and that is what you will find here. This website is stocked with the best information we have to help all that want it. Everything on this website is freely download able, without charge, if you can use it – copy it.

You should know that we are not lawyers, in fact we are not in their corrupt “law business” at all. We are outside of their legal system. We are a band of dedicated individuals who have chosen to make a stand to save all our Rights and to fight the corrupt legal system that seeks to destroy them. Do not misunderstand, we are not criminals, they can be found WORKING inside the “criminal justice system” as members of the bar.

Americans are now experiencing major and open disobedience to the written law by all government agencies. We continually find a disparity between the laws made in accordance with the Constitution and the daily operations of the government charged with acting only within the limits of those laws. The laws are crystal clear, yet most in government persistently promote a line of reasoning, application and enforcement, that is beneficial only to them, and contrary to the original intent expressed by “WE THE PEOPLE” in our Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

When you went into the court asking for justice, did you hire a lawyer? Did this “officer of the court” really work for you? Did your lawyer insist on handling your case his way? Did you put together a really good case, only to have it ignored? Did anybody actually read your documents? Were your arguments heard by the jury? Were you labeled as a trouble maker, one of those “Sovereigns”, “Constitutionalists” or a “Patriot” thereby guaranteeing your loss in the court room?

Did the judge who tried your case ignore Supreme Court rulings? Did he prevent any mention of the constitution? Did you lose in spite of overwhelming evidence in your favor? Did the police lie? Did the judge believe the police? Did the prosecutor offer to drop most of the charges if you would only plead “GUILTY” to one little charge? Do you feel you got a “fair” trial?

America, with less than 5 percent of the world population, has 25 percent of the world’s prisoners. There are 6 times as many Americans behind bars as are imprisoned in the 12 countries that make up the entire European Union, even though those countries have 100 million more citizens than the United States. Our jails and prisons have become the 51st state, with a greater combined population than Alaska, North Dakota and South Dakota.   Editorial, San Jose Mercury News.

Most people jailed today did not actually hurt anyone or damage any property, but rather they “violated” some legal taboo, some victimless crime, created by the government for revenue enhancement. This happens every day inside our state and federal courthouses. The scattered prisons in which thousands of non-violent people are locked away over half their lives because of their opposition to their tyrannical and dictatorial government, is not in some communist country. It is right here, in the United States of America. This is a crime against humanity by which the government of the United States, which trumpets itself as a defender of Rights, Liberty and Freedom, makes itself into an object of contempt and scorn in the eyes of the world.


You have Rights antecedent to all earthly governments;

Rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws;

Rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe.”

John Adams, Second President of the United States

These “Rights”, the lawful unalienable limitations regarding enforcement and jurisdiction, the place where government touches the lives and freedom of individual citizens, are a critical and fundamental principle of our very way of life. The differences between our actual daily experiences and the written law, is aggravating, confusing, frustrating, extremely dangerous and represents a significant threat to all of our liberties.

Today, “Your Honor” is a empty title that is commanded by the judge in courtrooms, but it is not earned, it is no longer a term of respect. Modern judges are given a special place of contempt in the minds of those who have been unfortunate enough to stand in judgment before them. Truth and Justice are no longer the American way.

Are you angry? Did you file a civil suit against the judge, the prosecutor and the police for their wrongs against you? Did you file criminal charges against them? Were you able to find a lawyer that would sue a fellow lawyer or a judge? Did you once again run into “Just-us Incorporated”, the enterprise run by “members” of the bar association (remember, NO lawyers are actually licensed to practice law). These “legal” practitioners, are able to ignore their oaths; refuse to obey the law, condone error, malicious conduct, corruption, deprivation of Rights, conspiracy, and wreak all manner of genuine evil against their fellow Americans, only because they have proclaimed themselves above the law and they have established a closed private system to protect each other.

How much of your money did the lawyer and the court take? Did you lose all your money, your property, or your liberty and spend time in jail? Have your friends and family turned their backs and abandoned you? Did you lose your job or your business?

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in a society, they create for themselves in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”  Frederic Bastiat 1850

Now you understand why they call it the “CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM”.


Had enough yet?  We can help.

To allow agents of government to exercise powers not granted according to constitutional law, and in violation of the written laws passed by our elected representatives, is to invite chaos and ultimately our national extinction.

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. When a long train of abuses and usurpation, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their Right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

Memorize these 5 points, and keep a printed copy with you wherever you go.

In court at the very begining when the judge first calls your name — tell these 5 things to the judge.

1 – I do not consent to these proceedings.

2 – Your offer is not accepted.

3 – I do not consent to being surety for this case and these proceedings.

4 – I demand the bond be immediately brought forward, so I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged.

5  –  I demand the original signed in ink contract be brought forward and entered into evidence.

The government corporation’s prosecutor – lawyer – cop must enter your original signed contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. Without the original signed contract, enforcement against you cannot take place lawfully . . . unless you do not make these 5 demands and thus consent to them proceeding.

The judge should immediately dismiss your case, and will tell you to leave the courthouse.

However, you must be ready for them to fight back or play with you, and if they do, you just go back and repeat the 5 main points, and tell them you cannot proceed until those 5 issues are resolved. They WILL try to move on to other proceedings or get you engaged in other things or issues, so be ready for their tricks to try and distract and dissuade you.

One of their common tricks to distract you – is to claim they do not understand your 5 points and they ask you to explain it to them.  You should reply — I am not here to teach you law – the government requires you to be competent.

Repeat your 5 statements and get these 5 items resolved first to stay on point and close the case against you in just a few minutes.

This strategy works because they do not want to reveal in public that your case is a COMMERCIAL BUSINESS MATTER and they are trying to squeeze money out of you.

According to Federal law 27 CFR 72.11:

Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.

Many states have their own statutes and these are where you are converted to a person for “commercial use” and Due Process of Law becomes a farce. This strategy will not likely to work in criminal cases where there is a real living damaged party or endangered party involved.

A living man is not subject to any of their statutory law and not within its “contemplation”.

Statutory Law exists only for the creations of Statute—- and not otherwise. That’s why it is called “Statutory Law” applies to artificial persons(corporations), not flesh and blood people, not women or men. It comes from the same Latin root word as State and Status.

State is the level of government that controls the International Jurisdictions of land and sea. This jurisdiction is inhabited entirely by artificial persons— Lawful Persons and Legal Persons. Technically, no living, breathing man exists in these jurisdictions.

I never volunteer to waive any of my rights or adopt any of their offices of personhood.

Tell them to read:

U.S. CONSTITUTION – Article VI. Article IV. Article XIV. Amendment X. Amendment XI.

Here are two cases you can use —- in addition to the Constitution.

“The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedures, absent contract.” See Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 1856, 60 US (19 How.) 393,

And further the Supreme Court has succinctly ruled,

“….every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen, without his consent.” Cruden vs. Neale, 1796, 2 N.C. 238, 2 S.E. 70. 

If the judge  pushes you into getting a public defender or a private attorney, only accept that attorney after forcing him to enter his state license to practice law (not his bar card) into the record.  Then force him to kick your case out of court and if he refuses – then fire him in open court for being corrupt and incompetent.




When a Sovereign appears in court he is not practicing law when he instructs the court and so the issue of a law license is not at issue. Sovereigns cannot practice law, because Sovereigns make the law. We do not see that the constitution is necessary or required in order for a Sovereign to appear in court to transact affairs there. Sovereigns “transact affairs” – they never practice law. Most judges, however, will appear to be confused about the difference, but they are not really confused at all, just devious. The Sovereign’s appearance in court does not constitute the practice of law and such a concept is absurd.

The 14th Amendment is mentioned by the Sovereign only to remind the court that the court and not the Sovereign is bound by it’s provisions as a minimum standard. This simply sets the minimum standard for the actions of the court. One is not invoking it as such, but merely stating the obvious – “Judge, you are reminded of the minimum standard which governs your actions”. What is not so obvious in the statement is that it is not governing your relationship with the court”. It is their Amendment not ours. It governs them not us.

A similar confusion exists with the Bill of Rights. It governs them not us. It prohibits them not us. The Bill of Rights has nothing to do with granting us Rights, but everything to do with granting the government some VERY LIMITED RIGHTS (Call them non-Rights or privileges). So the 14th Amendment – grants Sovereigns nothing, but it does govern the government and all artificial entities. It grants privileges to corporations and artificial entities where no Rights existed before. Therefore, the judges presume that we too are mere 14th Amendment citizens and they treat us as inferiors.

We always instruct the court on our true Sovereign status and place that into the record as evidence. We show that the constitution and statute law governs them, and is binding only on them alone. These stupid attorney “persons” in the black robes have it all backwards. It is the public servant judge who must be seated before we enter, and it is the judge who must stand when we enter, and it is the judge who must bow to us before taking his seat. It is the judge who is the hired help, a common public servant and nothing more. He leaves his personal Sovereignty at the door when he agrees to accept public money to do a menial task. He has contracted away his Sovereignty for the benefit of a steady pay check from his masters – the Sovereign people.

So, in court you should instruct the judge, like this:

“Judge, you are reminded of the minimum standard which governs your actions – the 14th Amendment”. “We are on the other hand a creature of God, and whether or not it pleases the court, you should stand and bow to WE THE PEOPLE in salute of that most wonderful creation before you today.”

“Thank-you, judge, now you may proceed”

They may wish to crucify us, they may want to assassinate us, but we remain unmoved and unbowed.

The judge must bow before the Sovereign people because of the greatness – seriousness of the task given him – it is a high honor to have been so blessed by the Sovereign, who has seen fit to delegate some measure of power and jurisdiction. To have a creature of God honor you in that fashion (granting jurisdiction) absolutely demands the receiver of such a high honor to kneel in reverence and respect.

The State court has been totally preempted by the 14th Amendment and the judge must remember that. So we simply are asking the question – “Judge, is it possible that a Sovereign could in any way have less Rights than an artificial person? And given the absurdity of such a possibility would the judge then please explain why such is occurring in this instant case. Of course as the judge is well aware, the reverse is in fact the case, and he must always be reminded of that minimum standard”.

Even if the 14th Amendment did not exist, the same question would be asked but in a different way – “Judge, is it possible that a Sovereign could in any way have less Rights than a chattel person? And given the absurdity of such a possibility would the judge then please explain why chattel semantics are being applied in this instant case.”

Just because we remind them about what exactly governs them, it does not ipso facto automatically cause us to be controlled by the same impositions which govern them. This is only a statement of the obvious. Stating the obvious law which governs them does not then automatically impose that very law upon us, just because we had the audacity to remind them and state the obvious about the limitations upon them.

It is time to stand up, and declare to all – “Beware an American Sovereign walks here, so care well where you tread lest you tread on me.” The Outlaws look forward to the day when all Americans strap their handguns to their belts and declare, “We have the Right, so We do it.” On that day all this nonsense and slavery imposed upon us by the government will end instantly – in this manner :

“Judge, did I just hear you say in open court that you will abrogate my Rights – and are you aware that is an act of treason? Please reconsider judge, because a Sovereign American stands before you today with an automatic Right to respond with force to such an act of treason, and I am loath to believe that you intended to commit this criminal act. What, you believe I am not empowered to act with force against your flagrant act of treason? Tell me what manner of law would prevent a Sovereign American from exercising force against you a common criminal?  If this bailiff will not arrest you, I most surely will.”

The judicial nonsense stops right here, enjoy our website